GreaseRag Web Site Harley Magazine Forums home Page Harley Magazine Subscription Services Harley Magazine Forum Home Page This Month's Issue of our Harley Magazine Harley Magzine Forum Member Photo Albums Harley Magazine Forum Classified Ads Harley Magazine Forum Archives Harley Magazine Forum Event Listings Harley Magazine Forum Links Contact Harley Magaziner Forum American Iron Licensing American Iron Advertising Harley Forum Terms of Service Harley Magazine Subscription Service


Go Back   Harley Forum - American Iron Magazine Harley Magazine > Harley Tech & Harley How-to > Harley EFI & Harley Carb

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2008, 02:26 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11
Default Carb Choice

I started collecting parts last fall for an engine rebuild I was planning to do over the winter. I was going to do the top and bottom seperate due to lack of money. After reading some replys from my last post I decided to take the advice & do top & bottom together & save time & money in the long run. I ended up with a Harley big bore kit, flat top pistons, high performance heads, 203 cams, perfect fit push rods & a 6200 rpm ignition. My question is what carb to use? Should I keep it all harley? My old bike was a 92 FLHS evo with a S&S super E. Ran great. I was thinking a super G. Any opinions are greatly appreciated.

Thanks
__________________
06FLHT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2008, 09:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,407
Default

Friends don't let friends run Super G's..

This is my experience..

I've run, not just tried, many diff carbs for over 32 years and waaay over 300,000 miles including Super B's, E's and G's.. I was what you might call an S&S guy..

When I finally got around to Mikuni I felt like a fool for not using them earlier..

Example-- My 120" got about 34mpg with a Super G and pretty good power,, heck I was happy..
I ran it that way for about 3 years..

Put on a 48 Mik and immediately picked up waaay power and 6 mpg..

I now run Mik 45's on the deep breathing 80" and the 93" shovel.. Also picked up power and mpg's..

The 127" is getting 31 mpg and good power with a G but that'll only be until I get another Mik 48..

There's my contribution..
__________________
"Fill your hands you son of a bitch"
Rooster Cogburn
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2008, 09:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: "Mo Town"
Posts: 2,176
Default

"HA"...I just knew when I first read this thread (hours ago) what frisco's responce (reliable) would be.

Yeah,and,now...I'm just (?) waiting for others to chime-in with (also reliable) recommendations that you LOSE the SE cams (chain-driven) and GO with similar gear-driven cams...if only (?) for longevity,etc...just wait and see !!!
__________________
"If at first you don't succeed, try again...then swear"
Mark Twain

Last edited by evoKENevo; 06-10-2008 at 10:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-10-2008, 11:45 PM
JCourneyaP's Avatar
Senior Member Deluxe
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Isanti, Mn
Posts: 1,234
Default

Naw. No one else will chime in. RL06FLHT asked a carb question. Frisco took care of it Toot Sweet! I have no input. If I had a carb question I'd look to Frisco to set me straight.
__________________
Joe

"You're a daisy if you do!" Doc Holliday
http://www.aimag.com/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-11-2008, 02:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,407
Default

Heeyy Joe, where you goin with that gun in your hand.? Great 60's song..!

Thanks for your confidence JC..

I bet there's some Cats 'n Kittys with real Hands-On experience with their own carb choice and you know I always encourage sharing First-Hand experience.. That's all that "walks the talk" in my book..
__________________
"Fill your hands you son of a bitch"
Rooster Cogburn
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-11-2008, 05:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: "Mo Town"
Posts: 2,176
Red face My bad...

Hey,Guys

Sorry...it seems that I could/should have done a better job at writing my original post/reply here. Because even with the best of intentions it's pretty obvious that it was misinterpreted as being somehow negatively-sarcastic,towards all the GOOD stuff I expected to follow. Which,in hindsight and/or re-reading my own words probably stems from my starting off with the "HA"...that was NOT meant to laugh AT all the GOOD stuff expected OR at those it was expected from.

I have nothing but respect for frisco's opinion (expected) on carbs,among other stuff,of course...and,was only hoping to get the ball rolling away from rebuilding a TC engine with chain VS gear driven cams...noting (here) all the "horror-stories" related to tensioners,etc.,"going-away" on their owners. The latter,of which, I figured would (with a little encouragement) come from those here who've "been there & done that",etc...knowhutImean !?!
__________________
"If at first you don't succeed, try again...then swear"
Mark Twain

Last edited by evoKENevo; 06-11-2008 at 09:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-11-2008, 02:21 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11
Default

Looks like a Mikuni 45 is the way to go. Harley seems to be more expensive for the same thing. I really like the idea of better gas milage. Spec sheets on the web site also show significant power gains. Thanks Frisco. I also agree with you Evo gear driven cams are the way to go, but the budget wont allow it on this one. Thanks for taking the time to reply.
__________________
06FLHT
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Banners




Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
(C) Copyright 2007-2009 TAM Communications, Inc.